Bloody hell it was hard enough to get points with the mis-spellings and double clues but then to not give a point for typing ontological argument just seems mean.

What is misspelt?

Ah,got it,typo?

Well at first glance, Contingent and Anselm are both incorrectly spelled. Ontological wasn't accepted when the answer given was "Ontological" and Teleological wasn't accepted for the "Design" group, and as Matt also already referred to there is the existence of a double clue, with "a priori" repeated across two groups... As for the remaining (Premise) group, it was almost impossible to categorise or accurately describe, tried epistemological arguments to no avail...

Very specific knowledge required for this one!