Unless I’m mistaken - a King is not an aristocrat - a king is a monarch (Royalty not aristocracy) A monarch appoints aristocrats but is not one themselves. The group itself was fair enough - but that distinction makes a correct category heading quite hard to define.

Good point, Neil - thank you. I'll try to re-think this (although to lose the word with the 'king' ending would mean losing a red herring ...) Maybe a whole new category is needed.

Shame the aristocrat link terms were so narrow - royalty, nobility and rank were all rejected.

Perhaps add nobility to that group?