Perfect asininity. An awful lot of these are bad. But yours can be pointed to as particularly bad examples. Kudos!

Ha ha! Fun grid!

Just to clarify. The reason I have commented on da88er's puzzles is because while many others are rotten puzzles, those ones are more obviously constructed by people who haven't a clue about many aspects of the game or even how to spell, make logical associations, or be consistent in any way what so ever...

Where da88er just seems to simply miss the point of the game. It's not a mind-reading contest. You must be able to do the first part as well as the second part.

In other words my criticism is harsh because _you_ could do this correctly. I can see that.

Going with the Barnaby flow here.
It is like a mind reading contest.

Feedback is always welcome, thank you. But, personal attacks are not (e.g. "Perfect asininity" is a bit personal and harsh). Let's at least try to be civil. Barnaby, I would like to try one of your grids to see how it should be done. What name are they under?

Da88er I don't know why people are moaning about your grids. I really enjoyed this one!

"Feedback is always welcome[..] But, personal attacks are not." - a perfect summary of my position on how commenters should conduct themselves.

Well, if you want to play that game that you don't understand how categories like:

"The 4 most common surnames in Wales"
"Middle names of some famous actresses"
And
"Things you can turn"

Are three kinds of asinine?

Then, I take back my comment. The second one.

Thank you for taking back one of your comments. I would still like to play your grids, what name are they under?